ASP.NET
  Home arrow ASP.NET arrow Page 5 - The Evolution Of Microsoft: .NET Explained
Dev Articles Forums 
ADO.NET  
Apache  
ASP  
ASP.NET  
C#  
C++  
ColdFusion  
COM/COM+  
Delphi-Kylix  
Design Usability  
Development Cycles  
DHTML  
Embedded Tools  
Flash  
Graphic Design  
HTML  
IIS  
Interviews  
Java  
JavaScript  
MySQL  
Oracle  
Photoshop  
PHP  
Reviews  
Ruby-on-Rails  
SQL  
SQL Server  
Style Sheets  
VB.Net  
Visual Basic  
Web Authoring  
Web Services  
Web Standards  
XML  
Dedicated Servers  
Moblin 
JMSL Numerical Library 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
ASP.NET

The Evolution Of Microsoft: .NET Explained
By: James Yang
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars / 20
    2001-12-23

    Table of Contents:
  • The Evolution Of Microsoft: .NET Explained
  • What is .NET?
  • Understanding .NET
  • The .NET framework (contd.)
  • The .NET framework(contd.)
  • Web Services
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    The Evolution Of Microsoft: .NET Explained - The .NET framework(contd.)


    (Page 5 of 7 )

    WinForms

    WinForms are an essential part of the Win32 application development system in .NET. They are the .NET standard of the graphics and drawing API’s and controls and are available to all of the .NET compatible languages. WinForms are equivalent to MFC for C++ developers, and the Win32 API for VB developers.

    Due to the unification and the way they are built, structured and integrated into the CLR, WinForms provide developers with features like a drag and drop designer, which can be used to visually create forms for .NET applications.

    ASP.NET

    The biggest and most popular change within the .NET framework occurred during the transformation of ASP to ASP.NET. In my opinion, ASP.NET is a completely different language compare to the older, classic version of ASP. A lot of people seem to get confused in relation to ASP.NET and some of its newer features. Let me clear up a couple of things before we continue:
    1. ASP.NET is not written in VBScript anymore. It now supports VB.NET, C# and JScript.NET.
    2. You cannot use ASP.NET code between <% and %< anymore. Also, you cannot use ASP.NET code in the <body< section of an HTML page, so no more <%=Response.Write(“Hello”)%<
    3. ASP.NET is based on an event-driven, object-orientated paradigm, not a sequential paradigm, like classic ASP.
    4. ASP and ASP.NET share very few similarities, besides their name.
    5. ASP.NET used to be called ASP+
    ASP.NET is a server side even driven language that is created using any of the .NET languages. Because ASP.NET utilises an even-driven, object-orientated programming paradigm, stronger, more formal syntax is enforced. This helps increase performance significantly, and the use of components, events, properties and methods is now easier.

    ASP.NET’s most significant benefits over traditional ASP relate directly to its integration with the CLR. ASP.NET takes a lot of features from the CLR, including support for common approach programming. Also, ASP.NET pages are compiled and cached in the servers’ memory once they are first executed. This provides a huge speed increases in comparison to traditional ASP pages, which were compiled every time they were executed.

    Scalability was another big issue with traditional ASP. Traditional ASP code and HTML could be written, mixed and matched on any one page, making it nearly impossible to keep track of which code was where. Sure, COM objects helped to separate code into tiers, but still a lot of developers just plonked their business logic directly into their ASP pages. Not good.

    ASP.NET however, almost completely eliminates this problem. ASP.NET code is object-orientated, and implementation code is kept separate from presentation code. All ASP.NET code is written between the <head< and </head< section of the page, or by using another separate page with a “Code Behind” reference to that page.

    More ASP.NET Articles
    More By James Yang


     

    ASP.NET ARTICLES

    - How Caching Means More Ca-ching, Part 2
    - How Caching Means More Ca-ching, Part 1
    - Reading a Delimited File Using ASP.Net and V...
    - What is .Net and Where is ASP.NET?
    - An Object Driven Interface with .Net
    - Create Your Own Guestbook In ASP.NET
    - HTTP File Download Without User Interaction ...
    - Dynamically Using Methods in ASP.NET
    - Changing the Page Size Interactively in a Da...
    - XML Serialization in ASP.NET
    - Using Objects in ASP.NET: Part 1/2
    - IE Web Controls in VB.NET
    - Class Frameworks in VB .NET
    - Cryptographic Objects in C#: Part 1
    - Sample Chapter: Pure ASP.Net







    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 3 hosted by Hostway