Web Authoring
  Home arrow Web Authoring arrow Evaluating XHTML Editors
Dev Articles Forums 
ADO.NET  
Apache  
ASP  
ASP.NET  
C#  
C++  
ColdFusion  
COM/COM+  
Delphi-Kylix  
Design Usability  
Development Cycles  
DHTML  
Embedded Tools  
Flash  
Graphic Design  
HTML  
IIS  
Interviews  
Java  
JavaScript  
MySQL  
Oracle  
Photoshop  
PHP  
Reviews  
Ruby-on-Rails  
SQL  
SQL Server  
Style Sheets  
VB.Net  
Visual Basic  
Web Authoring  
Web Services  
Web Standards  
XML  
Mobile Linux 
App Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
WEB AUTHORING

Evaluating XHTML Editors
By: Dan Wellman
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 23
    2004-11-22

    Table of Contents:
  • Evaluating XHTML Editors
  • HTML Gate 2005
  • Altova's XML Spy Home Edition
  • Hypertext builder, Web Scripting editor
  • HMTL Kit, Top Style Pro 3, and the rest

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Evaluating XHTML Editors


    (Page 1 of 5 )

    You've learned your Web programming language well enough that using a plain vanilla text editor no longer instructs; it slows you down. In short, you're ready for an XHTML editor. Which one should you choose? Dan Wellman checks them out, and discovers you may not have to spend any money at all to get one that suits your needs just fine.

    Without doubt, one of the best ways to learn a new Web programming language is to create all your first documents using nothing but a simple text editor, like Notepad. By hand-coding your first generation of documents using a basic text editor, you can really get a feel for the syntax of the language and the core components that make it up.  It is proven that learning is maximized by writing down the subject that you are learning, so using an application to take care of all the fundamental aspects of your documents, such as structure and definition tags, kind of defeats the object. This is as true for XHTML as it is for PHP, JavaScript or any of the other myriad of Web programming languages and specifications available to the Web developer today.

    But when you’re feeling a little more confident in your language of choice, you may begin to tire of typing out the same old tags, document after document after document. You’ll begin to find that using your plain old text editor is now boring you and slowing you down. It’s easy to lose interest in the task at hand when that task has become pure monotony, and losing interest in the site you are building can mean only failure or mediocrity at best, which is bad news for anyone planning on reeling in the surfers. Of course, some people never tire of the simplicity and power of the humble text editor, and this is fine, but for those of you that want to focus on content, you may find a dedicated "what you see is what you get" editor just the tool you’re looking for.

    For experienced HTML coders, making the switch to XHTML will be a relatively easy step to take; include some basic XML declarations, adhere to a few basic rules, remember not to use certain tags and you’re pretty much there. Once you’ve gotten out of the bad habits formed while using HTML, you may find that using an XHTML editor increases your output of valid, well-formed documents. If you do decide that this is the way forward for you, one of the following examples of this type of software may be exactly what you are looking for.

    Unfortunately, there do not seem to be a great many stand-alone, dedicated XHTML editors around, which I can only attribute to the relative newness of the specification. This can be seen either as a good thing, because there are not that many to choose from, or a bad thing, because there are not that many to choose from! What I mean is that finding an editor you like won't be a particularly time consuming task. Hopefully, after reading this, it will be even easier!

    More Web Authoring Articles
    More By Dan Wellman


       · Hi all,I hope you find this article both interesting and informative. Which...
     

    WEB AUTHORING ARTICLES

    - Developers Using Government Data to Create U...
    - Yahoo Pipes: Worth a Look
    - Completing an EAR
    - Building and Deploying an EAR
    - New Nuke Security Sentinel: Worth Taking a C...
    - Administering Your CMS-Based Web Site
    - What You Need to Know Before Using a CMS
    - Introducing the Google Maps API
    - An Overview of the Yahoo User Interface Libr...
    - Basic configuration of osCommerce, concluded
    - Basic configuration of osCommerce, continued
    - Basic configuration of osCommerce
    - Deploying your Site with PHPEclipse, continu...
    - Deploying your Site with phpEclipse
    - Macromedia Captivate Review







    © 2003-2010 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 1 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek