Web Authoring
  Home arrow Web Authoring arrow Page 5 - Evaluating XHTML Editors
Dev Articles Forums 
ADO.NET  
Apache  
ASP  
ASP.NET  
C#  
C++  
ColdFusion  
COM/COM+  
Delphi-Kylix  
Design Usability  
Development Cycles  
DHTML  
Embedded Tools  
Flash  
Graphic Design  
HTML  
IIS  
Interviews  
Java  
JavaScript  
MySQL  
Oracle  
Photoshop  
PHP  
Reviews  
Ruby-on-Rails  
SQL  
SQL Server  
Style Sheets  
VB.Net  
Visual Basic  
Web Authoring  
Web Services  
Web Standards  
XML  
Mobile Linux 
App Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
WEB AUTHORING

Evaluating XHTML Editors
By: Dan Wellman
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 23
    2004-11-22

    Table of Contents:
  • Evaluating XHTML Editors
  • HTML Gate 2005
  • Altova's XML Spy Home Edition
  • Hypertext builder, Web Scripting editor
  • HMTL Kit, Top Style Pro 3, and the rest

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Evaluating XHTML Editors - HMTL Kit, Top Style Pro 3, and the rest


    (Page 5 of 5 )

    HTML Kit (http://www.chami.com/html-kit/) offers a more professional feeling environment for your page authoring for the reasonable price of $55. It contains a vast array of tools and coding shortcuts, presented in a way reminiscent of a cut-down version of Dreamweaver. It has everything you’d expect from an application of this price including syntax highlighting, line numbering and a very useful Plugin Generator that acts as a kind of macro recorder to save commonly repeated tasks.  

    Perhaps one of the best features of this program is the built in Web browser that can submit the document you’re working on to the W3C online validator. There is also an interesting command-line function built into the main windows workspace that lets you type file commands instead of using the mouse to access menus. This is extensible as well, meaning you can add your own commands, and even includes a voice recognition feature enable you to issue commands by saying them out loud. 

    This is possibly the most customizable XHTML editor I have seen; the program also offers a very comprehensive online library of Plugins that allows you, for example, to extend the functionality of the software to incorporate advanced support for a multitude of Web programming languages, and to create your own menus, toolbars and templates.

    Around the higher end of this category, Top Style Pro 3 from Bradbury Software (http://www.bradsoft.com/topstyle/index.asp) does not do a lot to justify the $80 licence cost. Sure the program works, but it doesn’t do anything that cheaper (even free) programs don’t do and it also doesn’t look any better than other XHTML editors. 

    In addition to these stand alone applications, there are other types of XHTML editors. There are several browser based versions including the prolifically available XStandard that is available from Belus Technology (http://xstandard.com/download.asp), which includes a freeware Lite version in addition to the corporate Pro version. The cheapest licence for the pro version is $179 and allows the program to be used by up to 10 users for 1 URL. This product is obviously aimed at high level corporate organisations, and the average developer can safely leave the Lite version alone.

    Conclusion

    As mentioned at the start of this article, there are not yet a great many XHTML editors around. I’ve focused solely on actual applications rather than any of the browser based versions simply because a wider number of people will find them useful. They are all stand-alone applications that can be used without any additional or special software, as opposed to the browser based versions, some of which require a Web server, PHP and MySQL to run. I have attempted to weed out the good and the bad and to explain why, and after looking at and using all of these applications myself, I can safely say that I see no reason why money need be spent at all when deciding to switch to an XHTML editor.  


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.

       · Hi all,I hope you find this article both interesting and informative. Which...
     

    WEB AUTHORING ARTICLES

    - Yahoo Pipes: Worth a Look
    - Completing an EAR
    - Building and Deploying an EAR
    - New Nuke Security Sentinel: Worth Taking a C...
    - Administering Your CMS-Based Web Site
    - What You Need to Know Before Using a CMS
    - Introducing the Google Maps API
    - An Overview of the Yahoo User Interface Libr...
    - Basic configuration of osCommerce, concluded
    - Basic configuration of osCommerce, continued
    - Basic configuration of osCommerce
    - Deploying your Site with PHPEclipse, continu...
    - Deploying your Site with phpEclipse
    - Macromedia Captivate Review
    - Macromedia and Adobe Planning to Tie the Knot







    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek